3CDC Washington Park Public Hearing

Thursday night, Erica and I attended the public hearing for the upcoming 3CDC renovations to Washington Park. With our move to OTR, this was our first public hearing with this community, although for this particular project they're in the final stretch of planning.

This event was a real eye-opener for us and it left us a bit conflicted.

First, the project itself is impressive and 3CDC and the park board have put a lot of work into it. The overall plan is exciting and when completed it will be a real benefit to the community and its residents, and a real centerpiece in OTR. Their timeframe is aggressive to say the least, and if all goes according to plan they're looking for a completion sometime fall of 2011. It does mean the park will be closed completely at some point, but Steve Leeper committed over and over again that they would do everything they could to leave at least some part of the park open during construction for as long as possible.

The new park has a laundry list of features and attractions - a two-deck parking structure under the north section of the park, an absolutely awesome playground, a top-notch dog park, fountains, water features and state-of-the-art facilities to allow endless outdoor concerts and events.

Does it have everything everyone wanted? No, and that became a rather heated topic at the hearing. The two biggest points of contention were the lack of basketball courts and deep water pool.

Now, to put this post in context, there have been multiple hearings prior to Thursday's and I am assuming lots of community input throughout that helped build the current blueprints. This is an assumption on my part, because there was not a lot of thanks for what WAS included, only gripes about what wasn't.

In terms of the pool, this is a much wider subject than the park itself. This gets into problems with budget cuts at the recreation commission and city hall itself and the closures and cut-backs in every corner of the city. Some closures were new information as of last night and I think it's unfair to try and pin that on 3CDC. If people are angry they need to direct that at those who are actually responsible for our public pools and their closures. To their credit, 3CDC did offer to be an advocate on this topic and talk to the decision makers responsible for the pool closures in OTR.

Now, while I'm unable to put any blame on 3CDC for the pool, I think they did make a rather large mistake by not including new basketball courts in this park. They said the compromise is that the new courts at the SCPA will be open to the public when school is not in session. I find that a rather weak fix and with everything they did in this park I feel like leaving basketball courts out of this plan (courts which currently exist at the park) was a major mistake and added fuel to the fire. The basketball courts are an important part of the community and leaving them out is a mistake-- depending on the SCPA courts is tenuous at best.

It seemed like everyone had a representative at this hearing. Whether it was residents, the schools, the police, homeless advocates or any other foundation in town, someone was there. This is a big project and it will affect the entire city, and the turnout last night was evidence of that.

The ugly side of last night was how clearly divided people are on these issues, and more specifically, how divided OTR felt. There was a lot of criticism directed at 3CDC and new residents and at one point a new resident was even heckled when he stood up to speak and ask a question. He was later apologized to, but as new residents ourselves it was uncomfortable and made us wonder about our own impact in this community.

We ended up ducking out early (well, almost an hour later than it was scheduled to have ended) because things seemed to just keep stewing. Homeless advocates were going on the offensive against 3CDC and for whatever reason one guy was there railing on them about Fountain Square's parking garage and everything else they had done. There were a lot of valid questions and answers throughout the night, but they had definitely lost focus by the time we left.

In the end I think the park will play an important role in this community, in whatever form it ends up taking. It will be completed and I'm sure 3CDC will do a nice job of it. Not everyone will be happy with it, but I don't believe there's any solution that would have made everyone happy last night.

OTR is changing in drastic ways and it's doing it very quickly. There are also some very obvious divisions here, some new, some not so new. It ran the full spectrum last night. I talked to some people who were long-time residents that left us feeling good and welcomed, and then there were things said that made us feel not so good.

When it all gets boiled down, I think the issue of most concern is that long time residents are losing their community. I'm not talking about homeless advocates or the other half dozen groups who were there throwing stones last night. I'm talking about individuals and the residents of OTR. When they spoke you could tell it was genuine and that they're concerned about being pushed out and want to be part of the changes going on. OTR was an endangered neighborhood, and it still is, but perhaps for different reasons right now.

7 comments:

Radarman said...

This is the perfect time to re-read Tom Wolfe's "Mau-Mau-ing the Flak Catchers"

Oh, and someone should do a headcount on the number of teen age youth in OTR who live more than four or five blocks from a basketball court. They are all over the place, and there are even more in the West End. It will be very nice to have an area for passive pleasure.

VisuaLingual said...

It's really great to read someone else's perspective on the meeting. I think the process has been a major sticking point for a lot of people, not just specific amenities that will or won't be part of the rehabbed park.

I agree with Radarman's comment about "passive pleasure" - I'm not convinced that a park needs so many specific amenities, when the existence of a big, open, green space seems to be the basic benefit of a community park. But, given that it will be 1/3 bigger and will contain all these specific things, it's disappointing that older kids [or adults, for that matter] don't get something like basketball hoops, or a handball wall, or the checkers tables that I seem to be remember from the last meeting I attended.

Anyway, a few things stood out for me.

One, Pastor Dave, the mediator, really focused on making sure that all the various organizations and community groups were represented, but our landlady had to point out that she's a resident, and that that's an important constituency. Sometimes people forget that OTR has residents who have been in the neighborhood for however long, whether that's 5 years or 20.

When the representative from Human Nature mentioned in passing that their client was 3CDC, it gave me pause, but then I remembered that this presentation was just a courtesy. 3CDC is the catalyst behind the project, and Human Nature is first and foremost accountable to them, with the input of current residents and community activists being one factor among many in the decision-making process.

Lastly, Steve Leeper made a comment at one point about not being in "the pool business." True enough, but we did learn that night that, apparently, 3CDC is in "the parking garage business," which seems no more of a natural fit than a pool. Justin's questions about this were fairly relentless, and maybe overly specific and even annoying, but I'm not surprised that he kept asking, especially since Steve seemed unwilling to give a straight answer.

prolix21 said...

I agree about the parking garage business - and while it's unlikely they'll see profits from that in our lifetime (between park construction debt and the mounting OTR redevelopment debt) - 3CDC is walking a narrow line with them now owning a parking garage (at least in the eyes of their critics).

Paul Wilham said...

This is a positive step forward for OTR. lets be real the elimination of the basketball and pool are a clear attempt to eliminate the 'attractive nuisances" that would be used by people who wouldnt be living in the neighborhood in 10 years anyway. That's the reality, the park is being designed for who will be in the area in 5-10 years not now.

OTR is changing, its coming fast and many who live there do not see it.

VisuaLingual said...

Paul, I think many who live in OTR do see this, and that's why these community meetings tend to get so contentious.

Justin Jeffre said...

I don't understand why anyone takes issue with questions about the parking garage. 3CDC captured the revenue at the Fountain Square garage for 40 years and that left a massive hole in the city's parking fund. The public wasn't told about that. Until the question about this garage was asked nobody in the public knew that the Washington Park garage revenue and the concessions were going to be owned by 3CDC.

I only asked two questions and I don't really care if anyone found them annoying. I found some of the other questions and many of Stephen Leeper's answers to be annoying, but that is life. He has a bad attitude and 3CDC should be accountable for their actions, but they aren't.

I think it is ridiculous that some people see no problem with pushing out the community that currently lives there and that has been there for decades. There's plenty of room for the people that are there now and for tens of thousands of new residents as well.

We can have equitable development instead of gentrification. Diverse communities are attractive to people that want to live in a vibrant city. Some people are too small minded to see this. I bet they've never lived in NY or Chicago.

It is obvious that racism and classism is acceptable to some people. However, I find it very offensive.

Washington Park belongs to all city residents, especially those that live in that community. They have every right to be mad that their input was completely ignored. Why should the CEO's from Indian Hill be allowed to make decisions for our community?

And why wasn't anyone from the CRC there? How convenient that nobody was there.

For the record, nobody apologized to that guy and I don't think one was necessary. Bonnie said that they welcome him to the neighborhood. That lady that responded to his comment said you just want to make the community better for yourself, not for the rest of us. Based on his comment that is what it sounded like, though I believe he legitimately does want it to be better for everyone.

What that young man didn't seem to understand that the discussion about the park had been going on for years and there are larger issues at stake than just the park itself. There are some people that openly state that they want to poor to go somewhere else. How about we try to get rid of poverty instead.

Justin Jeffre said...

And what about those missing parking spaces?

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.